August 2007 — Features
Print this articleClick here to receive your FREE subscription to T.H.E. Journal
Opening a New Door
But it wasn't the potential cost savings alone that sold the district on open source. District 118 didn't even initiate its adoption plan with an operating system rollout, but with an implementation of OpenOffice, an open source alternative to Microsoft's ubiquitous Office suite.
"Everybody said, we've got to have Word, we've got to have Word!" Powell recalls. "We decided not to try to change anybody's mind about that. We just pushed OpenOffice to every desktop in the district. We never said a word, and people just started using it. For us, that application was the toe in the door."
ARE MICROSOFT'S PATENTS A PROBLEM?
THE SLOW PACE OF K-12 adoption of open technologies can probably be attributed primarily to concerns about how well they are supported. Another factor may be the unsettled nature of the software patent question. Microsoft, for example, has claimed that the Linux operating system and related open source software infringes on about 235 of its patents. Although that claim has been widely rejected in the open source community, concerns about potential patent problems down the road do find their way into the "cons" category when schools consider adopting open source software.
Recently, Microsoft has begun signing
cross-licensing agreements with some
Linux vendors to provide so-called patent
covenants—essentially, agreements not to
sue each other's customers over potential
patent infringements. These agreements
are part of a broader interoperability
proposition for Microsoft's customers,
says industry analyst and longtime
Microsoft watcher Neil Macehiter.
"Given the heterogeneity of most IT
environments today," Macehiter says,
"people are looking for greater interoperability,
particularly with respect to
open source. Microsoft is sending a
message to customers that it understands
the reality of their environments
and is doing its best by them to reduce
their concerns about the risks of Linux
infringing on Microsoft's intellectual property
and being sued."
However, Bruce Perens, the primary author of "The Open Source Definition," which is considered the manifesto of the open source movement, and co-founder of the Open Source Initiative, expects these deals to have little impact on open source adoption. "I don't see customers in a rush to get this kind of protection," he says. "I don't believe they perceive much of a risk, and I think they're right about that."
Perens points out that
Microsoft has yet to make a single
infringement claim. Why? He
suspects that it's too late. He
cites a legal doctrine known as
"laches," under which a patent
holder who becomes aware of an
infringement cannot delay enforcement
until the market is larger and would bring
greater royalties. "I think Microsoft has
simply waited too long," Perens says.