January 2006 — Policy/Advocacy
Print this article | Email this articleClick here to receive your FREE subscription to T.H.E. Journal
Addressing ‘Globalization 3.0’
The US is in significant danger of being bypassed creatively and intellectually, and losing our standing as leaders of the world in innovation—the driving force of our economy and a key element of our national character.
As I write this column, Congress is pondering cuts of $50 billion or more in social programs and education. Advocates for technology and education are struggling around the clock to hold on to about half of their Title II D (Enhancing Education Through Technology) funds that they originally received when NCLB was passed. We are watching every move of Congress and the FCC as they discuss telecommunications policy and the E-Rate, one of the most consequential programs in technology and education at either the state or national level. Should we in technology and education broaden the scope of our advocacy for such programs, or keep it narrowly focused?
What do you think? How do we address Globalization 3.0? What role does technology play as a part of the solution? What policies would you suggest? As Friedman points out, the technology that helped to create an economic advantage for the US is now being used by individuals and small groups, as well as countries, to surpass our efforts. Whatever we do, we need to do it rapidly. There is an old Chinese saying: “It is too late to dig a well when your house is on fire.”
Geoffrey H. Fletcher is editor-at-large of T.H.E. Journal and executive director of T.H.E. Institute.
Cite this Site
copy text (above) for proper citation
