May 2004 — Exclusive Series: SBR
Print this article | Email this articleClick here to receive your FREE subscription to T.H.E. Journal
Making the Case: Research Efforts on Educational Technology
7. Texas Education Agency
Evaluation of the Texas Technology Immersion Pilot (eTxTIP); $1.9 million over three years.
TxTIP is a technology immersion pilot seeking to increase student achievement by providing each student with a wireless mobile computing device, software, online and other learning resources. The TxTIP evaluation will study the effectiveness of technology immersion in increasing middle school students' achievement in core academic subjects, technology proficiency and attendance, among other outcomes.
8. West Virginia Education Department
ED PACE: Educational Development for Planning and Conducting Evaluations; $1.4 million over three years.
ED PACE will assess student achievement in virtual foreign language courses as compared to the achievement of students in classroom-based foreign language courses. Over three years, the project will generate three scientifically based research models (a summative, formative and action research model) that can be replicated in other settings.
9. West Virginia Education Department
The Evaluation of West Virginia's Enhancing Education Through Technology Model School Project; $1.3 million over three years.
The study will make use of technology-based desktop meters and random interval data collection pop-up screens to document the use, time, topic and function budgets of teachers and students. These methods will yield information about classroom integration of technology as an outcome of professional development and the impact of technology integration practices on student performance.
10. Wisconsin Public Instruction Dept.
A Study of the Effectiveness of Three Models of Implementing Educational Technology; $1.6 million over three years.
The Wisconsin project will (a) identify three promising models of educational technology use in state schools from existing data; (b) implement the models using the Title II, Part D competitive grant process; (c) and evaluate the effectiveness of the models on student achievement.
