January 2003 — Features
Print this article | Email this articleClick here to receive your FREE subscription to T.H.E. Journal
Facts and Assumptions of Assessment:Technology, The Missing Link
\par \par
\par References
\par\par Anderson, R. 1998. \ldblquote Why Talk About Different Ways to Grade? The Shift From Traditional Assessment to Alternative Assessment.\rdblquote New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74: 5-16.
\par \par\par Black, P. and D. Wiliam. 1998. \ldblquote Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment.\rdblquote Phi Delta Kappan. Online: www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm.
\par \par\par Bol, L., P. Stephenson and A. O\rquote Connell. 1998. \ldblquote Influence of Experience, Grade Level and Subject Area on Teachers\rquote Assess-ment Practices.\rdblquote The Journal of Educational Research, 91 (6): 323-330.
\par \par\par Chudowsky, N., and P. Behuniak. 1997. \ldblquote Establishing Consequential Validity for Large-Scale Performance Assessments.\rdblquote Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education: Chicago, IL.
\par \par\par Conner, D. 2002. \ldblquote Better Students Through Technology!\rdblquote Education World. Online: www.education-world.com/a_tech/tech149.shtml.
\par \par\par Crooks. T. J. 1988. \ldblquote The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students.\rdblquote Review of Educational Research, 58: 438-481.
\par \par\par Gipps, C. 1994. Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Education Assessment. London: Falmer Press.
\par \par\par Kane, M., N. Khattri, A. Reeve and R. Adamson. 1997. \ldblquote Assessment of Student Performance.\rdblquote Studies of Education Reform. U.S. Education Department\rquote s Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, D.C.
\par \par\par Kentucky Department of Education. 1999. \ldblquote Commonwealth Accountability Testing System: Common Terms and Acronyms.
\par \par\par Khattri, N., M. Kane and A. Reeve. 1995. \ldblquote How Performance Assessments Affect Teaching and Learning.\rdblquote [Research Report]. Educational Leadership.
\par \par\par Koretz, D., S. Barron, K. Mitchell and B. Stecher, B. 1996. \ldblquote Perceived Effects of The Kentucky Instructional Results Information System.\rdblquote Institute on Education and Training, RAND.
\par \par\par Means, B., J. Blando, K. Olson, T. Middleton, C. Morocco, A. Remz and J. Zorfass. 1993. \ldblquote Using Technology to Support Education Reform.\rdblquote U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. Online: www.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/TechReforms.
\par \par\par Mehrens, W. 1998. \ldblquote Consequences of Assessment: What is the Evidence?\rdblquote Education Policy Analysis Archives, 6(13). Online: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v6n13.html.
\par \par\par Mertler, Craig A. 1999. Assessing Student Performance: A Descriptive Study of the Classroom Assessment Practices of Ohio Teachers. Education, 120: 285.
\par \par\par Report of the Web-Based Education Commission to the President and the Congress of the United States. 2000. \ldblquote The Power of the Internet for Learning.\rdblquote Online: www.ed.gov/offices/AC/WBEC/FinalReport/WBECReport.pdf.
