August 1998 — Features
Print this article | Email this articleClick here to receive your FREE subscription to T.H.E. Journal
Eight Ways to Get Students More Engaged in Online Conferences
The teacher might say, for example, that everyone will get an A, B, or C for the peer helping portion of the final grade, depending on the peer helping ratings. The ratings might be in the form of "superior, good, fair, poor," or some equivalent. Another possibility is to have each student name the one student in the group who helped them the most. Students who are named more than once might get bonus points on the final grade. A similar approach could be used with a ranking scheme. Students with the best ranks get the most bonus points on the final grade.W.R. (Bill) Klemm is a professor at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas.
E-mail: wklemm@vetmed.tamu.edu
Editor's Note: The author originally presented this paper at the Teaching in the Community Colleges online conference (April 7-9, 1998).
References:
1. Eisley, M. E. (1991),
Guidelines for Conducting Instructional Discussions on a Computer
Conference, paper presented at the International Symposium on
Computer Conferencing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
2. Schmier, L. (1995), Random Thoughts. The Humanity of Teaching,
Madison, WI: Magna Publications.
3. Gabbert, B., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R. (1986), "Cooperative
learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain, and the
acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies," Journal of
Psychology, 120, pp. 265-278.
4. Johnson, D.W., Skon, L., and Johnson, R.T. (1980), "Effects of
cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions on
children's problem-solving performance," American Educational
Research Journal, 17, pp. 83-94.
5. Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R. (1981), "Effects of cooperative and
individualistic learning experiences on inter-ethnic interaction,"
Journal Educational Psychology, 73, pp. 454-459.
6. Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. (1989), Cooperation and
Competition: Theory and Research, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
7. Kadel, S., and Keehner, J. A. (Eds.) (1994), Collaborative
Learning. A Sourcebook for Higher Education (Vol. 2), University
Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and
Assessment.
8. Kaye, A.R. (Ed.) (1991), Collaborative Learning Through Computer
Conferencing, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Klemm, W.R. (1995), "Computer conferencing as a cooperative
learning environment," Cooperative Learning and College Teaching,
5(3), pp. 11-13.
10. McComb, M. (1993), "Augmenting a group discussion course with
computer-mediated communication in a small college setting,"
Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 1(3), Archived as McComb
IPCTV1N3 on Listserv@GUVM.
11. Nierenberg, G.I. (1982), The Art of Creative Thinking, New York,
NY: Barnes and Noble.
